🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of states are considering similar bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a good starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, support grew behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. However, the government committed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is largely unfolding at the state government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed measures demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various figures to mimic the Australian lead, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, other states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations adopt a more nuanced stance. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might backfire". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this global discussion continues, the actions of Australia and its followers show that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.