🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Substantial Sum in Damages from Euroclear over Frozen Funds Russia's monetary authority has announced it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move constitutes a direct warning by the Kremlin against plans to use immobilized Russian state funds to support Ukraine. The Financial Lawsuit Based on accounts in local state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim. European Union officials will determine in the coming days on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial needs. Most of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth. Dispute on Ownership EU officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has threatened retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal. Wider Implications With statements seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a severe assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States." Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions. Legal Hurdles Ahead While judges in European nations are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm. EU Countermeasures EU officials said they are working on steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation." How the Funding Would Work According to the detailed plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected. Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense damage caused during the ongoing war. Other Funding Ideas Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different method for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget. Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition. Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful message that when you cause all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."