🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are paid to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and more on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to erase African American heritage and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.